Jos Nato-jutut kiinnostaa - ja miksei kiinnostaisi Nato-ketjussa :D - niin täällä on aika seikkaperäistä analyysia Suomesta, Ruotsista ja Natosta kesäkuun eikun siis elokuun lopulta:
www.atlanticcouncil.org
En nyt ala referaattia tekemään, kun koko juttu on aika kiinnostava, mutta tuolla on joitain asioita, joita ei ehkä ole tullut ajatelleeksi. Ei mitään maata kaatavaa kuitenkaan. Siellä on myös arvioita siitä, millaisia velvollisuuksia Suomelle Natossa tulee.
Lisäys: No laitetaan nyt jotain mielenkiintoista arviota:
"To facilitate integration of various forces and units, Finland might consider creating and hosting a multinational division headquarters to be designated as Multinational Division High North (MND-HN).9 This command and control entity should primarily focus on the land domain, with appropriate air domain, electronic warfare, and special operations capabilities included, given the likely character of a Russian attack. Even though Finland currently lacks a peacetime division headquarters structure, it would make sense for Finland to build and lead such an entity given the size of its active and reserve land force, the scale of the defense challenge, and the unfamiliarity of most other allies with cold weather operations.
For its part, Sweden might consider doing the same in the air domain, offering to establish a Combined Air Operations Centre for the High North (CAOC-HN) in addition to similar entities in Germany and Spain. This new CAOC-HN would have responsibility for planning, directing, and supporting air operations of allocated assets in both peacetime and crisis across the Baltic region, Scandinavia, and the High North."
Sweden and Finland are on their way to NATO membership. Here's what needs to happen next.
In response to Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, Finland and Sweden took the historic step of applying to join NATO. Both nations will bring modern capabilities that will help defend against malign actors. As Finland and Sweden's membership is forthcoming, Alliance leaders, NATO watchers...
www.atlanticcouncil.org
En nyt ala referaattia tekemään, kun koko juttu on aika kiinnostava, mutta tuolla on joitain asioita, joita ei ehkä ole tullut ajatelleeksi. Ei mitään maata kaatavaa kuitenkaan. Siellä on myös arvioita siitä, millaisia velvollisuuksia Suomelle Natossa tulee.
Lisäys: No laitetaan nyt jotain mielenkiintoista arviota:
"To facilitate integration of various forces and units, Finland might consider creating and hosting a multinational division headquarters to be designated as Multinational Division High North (MND-HN).9 This command and control entity should primarily focus on the land domain, with appropriate air domain, electronic warfare, and special operations capabilities included, given the likely character of a Russian attack. Even though Finland currently lacks a peacetime division headquarters structure, it would make sense for Finland to build and lead such an entity given the size of its active and reserve land force, the scale of the defense challenge, and the unfamiliarity of most other allies with cold weather operations.
For its part, Sweden might consider doing the same in the air domain, offering to establish a Combined Air Operations Centre for the High North (CAOC-HN) in addition to similar entities in Germany and Spain. This new CAOC-HN would have responsibility for planning, directing, and supporting air operations of allocated assets in both peacetime and crisis across the Baltic region, Scandinavia, and the High North."
Viimeksi muokattu:
/img-s3.ilcdn.fi/d8f2f4d8323427f64ecc209b82d3da96ff41a01b50e9a64237a0ddd85818332e.jpg)
/img-s3.ilcdn.fi/d9c2d143573a870ddf5371b99a5948fa8d789030f3acb86c188e90716f3140b5.jpg)
