The media's been -- some very honest, but some very dishonest. You know that, you know that. I even read a story where Mark Meadows, tough guy, he was crying. This was a Maggie Haberman. You know she won a Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of Russia, but she was wrong on Russia. So was everyone else. They should all give back their Pulitzer Prizes. In fact, it turned out that the crime was committed by the other side! The crime was not committed by this side, it was committed by the other side -- a bunch of bad people!
You saw the reports coming out over the last two weeks. They got caught! So Maggie Haberman gets a Pulitzer Prize -- she’s a third-rate reporter. New York Times. And we put her name up here last week. You saw that. People thought it was a commercial. It wasn’t a commercial. It was like a commercial, but it wasn’t a commercial, it was just clips. And because we exposed her as being a bad reporter, what happened, is she came out and said Mark Meadows was crying, and they made it sound -- I said Mark -- and it’s OK if he did, I wouldn't -- you know, look -- but I think he was crying probably uh really for the wrong reason they had it down -- but he’s not a crier. And if he was -- I've known criers, I could tell you people that you know that are very famous, they cry, and that's OK too. But it was a nasty story in so many ways. It was fake news. And she only did it because we exposed her for being a terrible, dishonest reporter. I haven't spoken with her for a long time.
