Tästä olen erimieltä, ei suinkaan ole sattumaa että juuri tietyllä pelaajilla on tehotilasto plussalla ja tietyillä pakkasella. Se ei selity pitkässä sarjassa sillä että on hypännyt väärään aikaan kentälle tai sieltä tullut oikeaan aikaan pois. Minusta tehotilasto kertoo kyllä hyvin suunnan.
Mikä tulee tuohon Corsiin niin en ymmärrä miten se nyt on sen parempi puolustuspelin osalta.
Edit. Lisäyksenä lainaus Wikipediasta koskien tuota Corsia
While Corsi may provide a more accurate evaluation of players contributions to a winning effort than plus-minus (giving a plus to players who are on the ice when a goal is scored and a minus to players who are on the ice when a goal is scored on their own net), it does have its owns criticisms. For example, a player is on the ice for 30 shots on net and 20 shots against. This player is a defensive defenseman, and in this situation he only helped create 5 shots on net but his mistakes led to 15 shots against. This tells us his real impact on the game is -10 Corsi, but on the game sheet at the end of the game his Corsi number will be +10.
[7] This is because he was playing with better players around him and that boosted his Corsi number. Essentially, a good player playing consistently with bad players will get hammered by Corsi, while a good player playing with great players will get a boost. In this sense, Corsi is not the greatest tool for determining a player’s usefulness to his team and his impact on the game.