Mainos

Washington Capitals 2003-2004

  • 22 942
  • 215

Cube

Jäsen
Re: Askel kohti parempaa tulevaisuutta?

Viestin lähetti Ferris

En jaksa uskoa, että tämä valmentajanvaihdos muuttaa välttämättä joukkueen esityksiä kovinkaan paljoa, tai jos muuttaa niin sitten voidaan todeta että kaiken pahan alku ja juuri oli Cassidy. Itse luulen, että tilannetta pukukopissa ja organisaatiossa yleensä ei voida parantaa kuin selkesti uudelleen rakentamalla. Niinpä luulen, että huolimatta siitä miten loppukausi menee, tullaan maaliskuun puolivälissä näkemään jonkinnäköinne firesale, jossa lähtee noita ikiCapseja muualle.
Itse en ainakaan millään haluaisi näistä vanhoista pelaajista nähdä Bondraa minkään muun NHL-joukkueen paidassa.. Se on tietysti asia erikseen, jos itse haluaa lähteä. Jos Bondra kuitenkin treidataan, niin toivottavasti sitten johonkin, jossa miehellä on todellinen mahdollisuus voittaa Kannu.

Toinen, josta en todellakaan haluaisi luopua on Gonchar. Uskon, että Sergei tulee Carlylen valmennuksessa voittamaan vielä jossain vaiheessa Norrisin. Ei noita pisteitä voi jättää enää kauaa huomioimatta, kun Gonch parantaa kausi kaudelta myös oman pään peliä.

Muut pelaajat ovatkin sitten aika pitkälti vapaata riistaa mielestäni (tietysti lupaavampia nuoria lukuunottamatta). Robert Lang on tosin pelannut niin uskomattomalla tasolla, että takaisinkin pitää jo tulla jotain aika laadukasta. Jagr on myöskin takonut pisteitä viime aikoina ihan mukavasti, mutta on silti liian kallis ja jääräpäinen, että hänet kannattaisi pitää. Mulle sopisi hyvin, että lähtisi Rangersiin vaihdossa Lundmarkiin (kunhan taas toipuu pelikuntoon) tai Anson Carteriin. Mitään jälleenrakennusurakkaa on aivan turha kuitenkaan aloittaa niin kauan kuin Jagr on DC:ssä.

On muuten vähän sellainen olo, ettei Cassidy tule enää ainakaan vähään aikaan valmentamaan NHL:ssä. Jos koskaan.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Re: Re: Askel kohti parempaa tulevaisuutta?

Viestin lähetti Cube
Itse en ainakaan millään haluaisi näistä vanhoista pelaajista nähdä Bondraa minkään muun NHL-joukkueen paidassa.. Se on tietysti asia erikseen, jos itse haluaa lähteä. Jos Bondra kuitenkin treidataan, niin toivottavasti sitten johonkin, jossa miehellä on todellinen mahdollisuus voittaa Kannu.

Toinen, josta en todellakaan haluaisi luopua on Gonchar. Uskon, että Sergei tulee Carlylen valmennuksessa voittamaan vielä jossain vaiheessa Norrisin. Ei noita pisteitä voi jättää enää kauaa huomioimatta, kun Gonch parantaa kausi kaudelta myös oman pään peliä.


Samoilla linjoilla ollaan Cuben kanssa, itsekään en haluaisi nimenomaan noita kahta nähdä muussa paidassa. Oliekin kuuluu lähes samaan ryhmään, mutta kun tuo nuori maalivahtiosasto on aikas lupaava niin jos Oliesta saadaan Coloradolta (tai joltain muulta) sopiva hinta niin olen henkisesti valmis hyväksymään kaupan kyllä.

Noiden "vanhojen herrojen" kauppaamisessa on se ikävä puoli, että kyseiset pelaajat edustavat itselle Caps-ikoneita, jotka ovat joukkueessa pelanneet koko sen ajan kun toimintaa on tullut seurattua. Mutta toisaalta mielessä on käynyt, että jos halutaan todellakin uudelleen rakentaan niin voisi olla ihan järkevää "hankkiutua eroon" vanhuksien kuppikunnasta, jos se on esteenä tulevaisuuden mahdolliselle menestykselle. Sitä olisi niin paljon helpompi spekuloida kun tietäisi mitä siellä kopissa ja kulisseissa oikein on meneillään. :D

Sitten pari hajahuomiota päivän lehdistä. Luettuani WPostin jutut Cassidystä en ihmettele yhtään että lähtö tuli. Toisaalta pitää kyllä muistaa että kovin yksipuolista kuvaahan tuo lehdistö tällaisissa tilanteissa aina antaa. Mieluummin kuitenkin Hanlon penkin takana, joka tuntee organisaation jo vuosien takaa kuin Cassidy.

WTimesissa oli seuraavanlaisia nootteja:

Notes — With Witt likely out two games with a bruised shoulder, the Caps recalled defenseman Dwayne Zinger from Portland. ... McPhee said rookie left wing Alexander Semin will probably join Russia's World Cup team today and not return until early January. Randy Carlyle and goalie coach Dave Prior will remain as Hanlon's assistants. ... Hanlon and McPhee have opted to keep the system of three assistant captains at home and three others on the road with no one wearing the traditional "C."
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Muutoksia havaittavissa

Jo ensimmäisen pelin jälkeen voitaneen sanoa, että muutoksia Caps-kokoonpanossa on tapahtumassa. Hanlon tuo joukkueeseen omia "suosikkejaan", jotka ovat aika pitkälti samoja kuin allekirjoittaneen.

Kuten asioita meren takana lähempää seuraavat tahot ennakoivatkin tulevat määrätyt pelaajat saamaan Hanlonin alaisuudessa enemmän mahdollisuuksia kuin edeltäjänsä. Hyvänä esimerkkinä Sutherbyn siirto suoraan nelosen jämäminuuteista kakkoseen Bondran ja Zubruksen laidalle sekä Pettingerin peluutus Halpernin ja Grierin kanssa kolmosen jarrukentässä. Kummatkin ketjut olivat mukavassa iskussa Boston-voitossa, jossa maalin makuun pääsivät myös nämä alisuorittajat kuten Battaglia ja Halpern. Mielestäni nyt mennään oikeaan suuntaan siinä, että nuorille ja muillekin annetaan TODELLISIA näyttöpaikkoja.

Lupauksia herättävää allekirjoittaneen mielestä oli myös tämän päivän tieto, että Ivana Ciernik laitettiin farmiin ja ylös nostettiin Whitfield. Jälleen hyvä, ja odotettu, veto mielestäni Hanlonilta. Pehmeähkö, mutta ehkä hieman taitavampi Ciernik farmiin ja todellinen joukkuepelaaja ja taistelija Whitfield nelosen keskelle. Ei lie yhteensattumaa, että Whitfield on pelannut Hanlonin alaisuudessa kolmisen kautta farmissa... :)

Ennakkoidut ketjut Wings-kohtaamiseen:

14-Miller 20-Lang 68-Jagr
16-Sutherby 9-Zubrus 12-Bondra
18-Pettinger 11-Halpern 25-Grier
15-Gordon 23-Whitfield 51-Peat

29-Kwiatkowski 55-Gonchar
4-Berry 8-Eminger
3-Doig 49-Zinger

1-Stana
37-Kolzig

2-4 hyökkäysketjut miellyttävät allekirjoittanutta aikalailla. On mielenkiintoista nähdä mitä tapahtuu kun Nylander palaa: tippuuko Miller penkille vai mitä tehdään. Mieluiten näkisin melkein Seminin tuossa Millerin paikalla, mutta sitä mahdollista kokeilua joudutaan odottamaan ensi vuoden puolelle. Gordonia voisi melkein käyttää joksikin aikaa Portlandissa, jossa tarjolla olisi isompaa roolia.

Puolustus on mikä on, paljon vaihtoehtoja ei toistaiseksi ole kun farmissakin on loukkaantumisia paljon. Jos Yonkman olisi kunnossa niin voisin lyödä vetoa, että hänet olisi viimeistään nyt nostettu ylös. Witt kun palaa niin Zinger lähtenee takaisin farmiin. Veikkaan, että Caps tekee jonkinlaisen puolustukseen liittyvän siirron tässä lähiaikoina. Mitään maatakaatavaa ei kannattane odottaa, mutta joku peruspakki voi vaikka haaviin tarttua waiversista tai pienellä kaupalla.

Kaiken kaikkiaan mielikuvani Hanlonista on vahvistunut tässä parin päivän aikana, jona olen miehen lausuntoja lukenut. Erityisesti tämän päivän otteluennakkossa annetut kommentit pelaajien peluuttamisesta olivat lupauksia herättäviä.

Toivottavasti Hanlonin energisyys ja rento olemus johdattaa Capsit vastaavanlaiseen voittoon Detroitista kuin mitä edellinen kohtaaminen oli...
 

Ferris

Jäsen
More to come

Kauaa ei tarvinnut odotella seuraavaa Hanlonin siirtoa: Maxime Ouellet on kutsuttu ylös ja pelannee toisen seuraavasta kahdesta ottelusta ainakin. Joko Atlantaa tai Floridaa vastaan siis. Stana lähetettiin farmiin ja hän pelasi jo eilen Portlandin riveissä.

Kölzig on päästänyt tällä kaudella paljon helppoja maaleja, viimeeksi eilen Detroitia vastaan. Luulen, että Hanlon pyrkii herättelemään Olieta tällä Maxin kutsulla, hänhän on käytännössä ainut veskari, joka pystyy Olieta toistaiseksi haastamaan. Samalla tietysti tuota Olien järetöntä pelaamismäärää pyritään pienentämään.

Ouellet on pelannut farmissa loppuvuodesta Oliemaisia määriä sen jälkeen kun Stana nostettiin Caps-kakkoseksi. Yli kymmenen ottelun putki päättyi sunnuntaisen ylöskutsun vuoksi. Portlandilla kulkee muuten yhtä "hyvin" kuin Capseilla: Joukkue on itäisen konferenssi jaetulla viimeisellä sijalla seuraavalla recordilla: 26 9-14-1-2-21.

Edit: Nuorten MM_kisoissa ei nähdä sitten yhtään Kanukki-Caps-prospektia kuten tuolla maajoukkueosaston ketjussa jo hielo totesi. Fehr ja Daigneault olivat ensimmäisten viiden joukosta tippuneen ryhmässä.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Hanlonin paikka täytetty

Jay Leach on uusi apuvalkku. Kokemusta miehellä on mm. Losin, Atlantan ja Devilsien penkin takaa kakkosmiehenä.

Ensi yönä Ouellet tekee sitten virallisen Caps-debyyttinsä NHL:ssä. Alustava kokoonpano lupailee seuraavaa:

14-Miller 20-Lang 68-Jagr
18-Pettinger 9-Zubrus 12-Bondra
23-Whitfield 11-Halpern 25-Grier
13-Battaglia 15-Gordon 24-Willsie

8-Eminger 55-Gonchar
3-Doig 29-Kwiatkowski
4-Berry 49-Zinger

33-Ouellet
37-Kolzig

Kolmos-nelosketjujen sekoittelu jatkuu edelleen, Hanlon ilmeisimmin hahmottelee, ketkä ansaitsevat paikkansa ja ketkä eivät.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Mielenkiintoiset tilastot

joita ei muka enää pidetä - mutta kyllähän NHLPA pitää huolen omiensa neuvotteluasemista. Eli tässä Capsien tämän kauden taklaus ym. virallisesti nykyisin tilastoimattomat tilastot:

Hits:

1st Jason Doig WASH D 54
2nd Michael Grier WASH R 37
3rd Brendan Witt WASH D 35
4th Steve Eminger WASH D 28
5th Matt Pettinger WASH L 22
6th Joel Kwiatkowski WASH D 20
6th Rick Berry WASH D 20
8th Jeff Halpern WASH C 18
9th Dainius Zubrus WASH R 17
10th Brian Sutherby WASH C 14

Blocks

1st Steve Eminger WASH D 42
2nd Brendan Witt WASH D 34
3rd Dainius Zubrus WASH R 27
3rd Michael Grier WASH R 27
5th Jason Doig WASH D 26
5th Boyd Gordon WASH R 26
7th Joel Kwiatkowski WASH D 25
8th Sergei Gonchar WASH D 21
9th Jeff Halpern WASH C 20
10th Brian Sutherby WASH C 16

Takeaways

1st Dainius Zubrus WASH R 25
2nd Jeff Halpern WASH C 23
3rd Robert Lang WASH C 17
4th Jaromir Jagr WASH R 16
4th Michael Grier WASH R 16
6th Sergei Gonchar WASH D 14
7th Jason Doig WASH D 13
8th Boyd Gordon WASH R 12
9th Joel Kwiatkowski WASH D 10
10th Peter Bondra WASH R 9
10th Alex Semin WASH L 9

Giveaways

Jagr 50
Lang 48
Gonchar 36
Zubrus 33
Bondra 23
Doig 21
Witt 19
Kiwi 17
Eminger 17
Grier 16
 

Henkka

Jäsen
Suosikkijoukkue
Liiga, NHL, CHL, SHL
Viestin lähetti Justus
Mistäs tollaisia tilastoimattomia tilastoja löytää?

Joutuu vähän kikkailemaan.

http://www.nhlpa.com/Content/WebStats/LeagueWideRankings.asp

Tuonne menet ja select 01-02 season.

Sitten valitset statsityypeiksi se hits, blocks, giveaways.

Sen jälkeen klikkaat haluaamasi joukkueen.

Ja lopuksi klikkaat 03-04 season.

Pakko mainita nyt Justuksen ollessa kyseessä että kyllä, Sergei Zubovilla on eniten kiekonmenetyksiä koko liigassa. :)
 

NIN

Jäsen
Suosikkijoukkue
Fucking Horseshit
Mikäs uutinen tuo nyt oli? Kärkipaikkahan on ollut Zubiella kiikarissa vuosikaudet, mutta vasta nyt tuli mahdolliseksi sen saavuttaminen, kun Roy lopetti! :)
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Joululahja!

Kaksi seuraavaa Caps-ottelua nähdään Canalilta! Su-ma välisenä yönä kello 1 alkaa Caps-Isles ja ti-ke yönä kello 2 nähdään sitten Caps-Habs. Todella mielenkiinnolla odotan noita kahta peliä. Mukava nähdä ihan omin silmin Hanlonin vaikutus pelityyliin jne.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Arvosanat/ Forbes ylös + Suts alas

viime yön ottelusta meren takaiselta kaiffarilta. Näitä on tulossa jatkossa lähes joka pelin jälkeen:

Forwards:

Dainius Zubrus: A-. Played a generally solid game against Mats Sundin, who always seems to be a load against the Caps. His goal was another example of his not being shy about using his backhand. He plays with a certain confidence these days; he’s becoming a presence on the ice.

Jeff Halpern: B+. Halpern has played much better of late, and tonight was another in a series. He was sent out to take the important draws in his own end and ended up winning 14 of 22 overall. Plus, he got 18 minutes, and reward for hard work and a reflection that this was a grinding kind of game.

Peter Bondra: B. Bondra has developed a talent for stepping up his defensive game when he’s not getting chances offensively. He was a minus-1, but it was not of his doing.

Bates Battaglia: B. This is not the same guy who sleep-walked through a dozen games after the trade from Colroado. He was hootin’ it up on the ice, and his backhand pass created a wonderful chance for someone, whose name escapes me at the moment.

Kip Miller: A-. Miller has his liabilities. He is not a terribly efficient skater (he had a mini-break, but out of recognition of this fault, actually passed it up to try and find a late arrival), and he is often overmatched physically. But he has great hands, and they led to both goals . . . his taking the puck at the goal line and banking it off Trevor Kidd’s skate did not strike me as chance. And, his little chip to Zubrus allowed Zubrus to walk around to find room and lift the pouck over Kidd’s glove.

Boyd Gordon: D. There are going to be nights like this. He doesn’t have many, though. Tonight, he got tangled up with Ponikarovsky, then didn’t get off the seat of his pant sfast enough to catch up with the Toronto foprward as he batted a loose puck into the far side of the net. He had an off night on draws (lost 7 of 10), and his penalty late in overtime pretty much ended a chance for a second standings point. Growing pains.

Brian Sutherby: B-. One thing is beginning to concern me about Sutherby. There doesn’t seem to be a clear progression of improvement in his play. He seems to be working hard out there, but the payoff isn’t coming in terms of results. More to the point, he hasn’t really shown very much offensively. Part of that is that he isn’t playing with particularly adept offensive players, but there is a chicken and egg thing here . . . is he showing enough to merit moving up the lines? Tonight, he got the least amount of ice time of any forward.

Trent Whitfield: B. Wind him up, watch him go. He doesn’t take a shift off, skating as if he appreciates the fact that he gets to play in the NHL. He, Sutherby, and Gordon make a pretty fair energy line.

Matt Pettinger: B+. You wanna piece o’dis? You wanna piece o’dis?! I really thought he was going to go with Tie Domi, yapping at him all the way to the bench with that goofy hick smile of his. He just missed on a couple of back door chances.

Robert Lang: A. He had, what for him, is a pretty average night offensively, but he is so slick with the puck. Toronto played a pressure penalty kill, aggressively challenging Caps who held the puck along the side boards. Like it mattered . . . he was still effective in setting up from the left side (once the Caps got their gawd-awful first power play out of the way, when they weren’t close to registering a shot).

Brian Willsie: B. Willsie did a much better job of hustling to the net. He’s not the biggest guy out there, but he had a couple of chances of his own making for garbage. He (with Zubrus) led the team in shots, with five.

Mike Grier: B. The great goal watch continues . . . He had a shot tonight, but he also had another chance dance off his stick. He did draw a penalty late in regulation through some hard work going to the net, and his defense was effective this night.

Defense:

Jason Doig: D-. If the Caps lost, I’d have flunked him. Right now, he is a liability out there. Call it a slump, but he was merely a spectator on the Sundin goal, allowing the forward to walk around and in alone on Olaf Kolzig. He was having trouble handling the puck in his own end, even when not pressured.

Rick Berry: B. Berry continues to refine his game, being physical when the opportunity is presented, but otherwise playing much more within his talents. He had some troubles of his own in handling the puck, but for the most part not in situations that could burn him.

Steve Eminger: B. Played a pretty smart game, keeping things simple. This is the kind of a game – one with no flow and a lot of stoppages – that a young, talented skater such as he can make mistakes in. He kept those to a minimum.

Joel Kwiatkowski: B. Who’d have thought it would come to this . . . Kwiatkowski as the responsible one on his pair. But, with Doig struggling lately, that’s what we’ve got. He, like his cohort, played a more or less steady game

Dwayne Zinger: B-. I had my heart in my throat a couple of times when Zinger was the last man back, in his own zone, handling the puck. But the kid did ok. He’s being spoon-fed minutes (seven and change tonight), but he’s giving good effort and playing reliably with those minutes.

Sergei Gonchar: C. Let’s see . . . almost knocked the puck into his own net, had a couple of howlers for turnovers, seemed indecisive on the power play. And, this is a team that seem to rattles him early (literally). This was not one of his best efforts.

Goaltending:

Olaf Kolzig: A. Kolzig left very few juicy rebounds, and when one threatened to skitter away, he was quick to leap on it and get a stoppage. I can’t really fault him for either goal, both being the results of defensive breakdowns in front of him (Gordon letting Ponikarovsky get loose on the first one, Doig waving as Sundin went by on the other). He got help from the pipes (I counted no fewer than three posts and a crossbar hit), but he played a strong game against a hot team. He was much better late than early.

Special teams: A. The Caps stayed out of the box (and got helped a bit by referees Jackson and Watson largely putting away their whistles in the third), and they killed the two chances they gave up. The power play continues to be effective, tonight getting two of seven chances. The second unit doesn’t offer much in terms of offensive pressure, but it’s out there largely due to Jagr’s absence.

Coaching: A. Hanlon seems to be pressing the right buttons to get effort from guys who had been struggling, most notably Bates Battaglia and Joel Kwiatkowski.

Overall: B+. The Caps were lucky to get out of the first down only a goal; they simply weren’t skating in the first. But, they stepped up the pace in the last two periods (as much as Toronto would allow, since they preferred to play in 45 second increments, followed by a stoppage . . . this had to be the longest regulation game of the year, without the overtime). It would be tempting to look at this game and think that the Caps didn't do much, especially with Trevor Kidd in goal (against whom they've had a lot of success. But, this was against a team that had points in its last 12 consecutive games (a franchise record), and Toronto played a really ugly game . . . it was the equivalent of a rope-a-dope boxing match with all the stoppages. I think it’d be hard to quibble too much with the Caps’ effort and the result. A month ago, the Caps probably lose this game, 4-1 (caving in after the Leafs scored in the very next shift after the Caps’ first goal).

Three Stars:

Third Star: Robert Lang
Second Star: Dainius Zubrus
First Star: Olaf Kolzig

Slice o’ Pie: Kip Miller, who showed just what he brings to the team tonight.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hanlon kutsui jälleen yhden suosikeistaan eli Colin Forbesin ylös. Samalla Brian Sutherby lähti Portlandiin luultavimmin hakemaan lisää peliaikaa sekä itseluottamusta kiekolliseen peliinsä.
 

Mack

Jäsen
Suosikkijoukkue
Jokerit
Pakko sanoa että mielestäni tuo Capsien puolustus on karmea. Heillä on yksi liigan ellei liigan paras kiekollinen yv-pakki eikä sen lisäksi yhtään mitään?? Joukko jotain 5-7 pakkeja! Doig ja Kwiatkowski voivat joskus muistella tätä aikaa urastaan aikana jolloin oli todellinen läpimurron paikka mutta jotenkin tuntuu ettei poikien rahkeet riitä...

Ihmetellä täytyy myös ettei Boumedienne onnistu saamaan tuosta joukosta pelipaikkaa! Mies on nyt ollut pitkään poissa mutta tuskin helposti nousee Portlandista.

Ja Olie pelaa varmaan uransa paskinta kautta maalin suulla.


MACK
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Arvosanoja taas:

Forwards:

Dainius Zubrus: D. There are still some nights when he’s invisible. This should have been a team he could have success with, since he is either bigger than or faster than just about any center the Islanders would have used against him. But, he was next to invisible at both ends and lost 12 of 18 draws.

Jeff Halpern: B-. Halpern is the other end of the spectrum. He’s asked to check the other team’s top center on most nights, but more often than not tonight he was out there against Dave Scatchard, who’s been a bit of a disappointment. Halpern played a decent game, and even though he was -1 (certainly not of his doing, that being the Czerkawski goal off a Diog giveaway) played as good a defensive game as any Caps forward tonight.

Peter Bondra: B. Most nights, Bondra relies on others to set up his offense. Tonight, those openings were not there, yet he still managed to register two assists. Not an extraordinary night, but a good night nonetheless.

Bates Battaglia: B. Seemed to have trouble getting started, not exhibiting the energy level he had in the past three or four games. He did pick up the pace some in the second and third periods, but was inconsistent in applying a forecheck.

Kip Miller: B-. Miller had one highlight moment, settling a laser of a pass, then moving the puck to his forehand to whip it by Rick DiPietro. Other than that, though, it was a tough night. He just was not providing much support defensively.

Boyd Gordon: C-. Gordon did not have a very strong game, he had a couple of decent chances offensively, but he was on the ice for three Islander goals. He’s starting to blend into the background, and he only had 11 minutes tonight. One wonders if he’s not hitting a wall of sorts . . . part of the long void of games that the NHL goes through from mid-December to the all-star break.

Matt Pettinger: C. Played almost not at all in the first period and only had about ten minutes for the game. In none of those minutes did he particularly distinguish himself.

Trent Whitfield: B-. The effort was there, but he seemed at times as if he was skating in slush. Was part of what was a poor penalty killing performance for the Caps.

Robert Lang: B. Scored on his only two shots (I especially liked the one where he whacked it off the post, then when the puck popped in the air, he whacked it off Garth Snow’s mask). But he was in entirely too much of a hurry to transition from defense to offense tonight.

Brian Willsie: B. He had the highlight play of the night for the Caps when he collected the puck, used his superior speed to slide around Scatchard, pulled the puck around a clueless Roman Hamrlik, and before Mattais Timander could get into the play, he snapped the puck past DiPietro. If the Caps had won, this would be the goal everyone would be talking about.

Mike Grier: C. The very epitome of an "average" night . . . no goals were scored for either team when he was on the ice. But you look at his body english these days, and you can swear, he doesn’t want the puck.

Jaromir Jagr: B. Well, if he has a broken thumb, he has a higher pain threshold than anyone has ever given him. A couple of times, he lost the puck off his stick in situations you might not normally see it happen, but he was quite adept at skating into the zone, showing the puck to the defender, and pulling it wide to create a skating lane for himself. He wasn’t shooting the puck with authority, but his passing wasn’t far off his norm. But, like a lot of forwards for the Caps, he seemed a little to ansy to get out of the zone to go on offense.

Defense:

Jason Doig: F. This is the failing grade he probably should have had the last game. Bad decision making led directly to the Yashin goal (partial screen on Kolzig), and a howler of an error led to the Czerkawski goal. It could have been worse but for some decent plays by Kolzig. He didn’t handle the puck cleanly, his passing wasn’t crisp, and he looked as if he knew not where he should be most of the night. It was his worst game of the year.

Rick Berry: C. He got victimized on the Islanders’ first goal when Papineau snuck out for a backhander. He made a decent hit on an Islander midway through, but sometimes that’s the worst thing that can happen to a player like Berry . . . he starts looking more for them than the smart play.

Steve Eminger: B. I might not be a compliment to say it tonight, but he was -- by leaps and bounds -- the best defenseman on the ice for the Caps. His one mistake cost him as Parrish was able to not a power play goal.

Joel Kwiatkowski: C-. You could say he suffered most by being Doig’s partner for much of the night, but it’s not like he did a superior job covering for his partner, either. Consistency still seems to be a problem with Kwiatkowski.

Dwayne Zinger: incomplete. You get less than five minutes, what grade can you get?

Sergei Gonchar: B+. Well, if nothing else, things sure happened when he was out there. Five goals were scored with him on the ice, including all four goals scored by the Caps . . . but with all that, I saw a guy out there who skated rather listlessly, especially in the first period when on a couple of occasions he was slow to cover an Islander who had too much time and space to try to pick a corner on Kolzig.

Goaltending:

Olaf Kolzig: C+. Kolzig is the designated punching bag for December. Just like in football, where the fans’ favorite player is the backup quarterback, the favorite player among Caps fans these days is the backup goalie, Maxime Ouellet (last month, it was Rastislav Stana). By comparison, every goal Kolzig allows is, by its very definition, soft. Well, here’s the breakdown as I saw it. Papineau’s goal . . . hey, if a guy is allowed to step out, and then he roofs a backhand high glove, you tip your hat to him and tell yourself "he won’t do that again if he gets to tee it up." Parrish . . . this one Kolzig should have had, and if he’d been as sharp as he was in the first, he proabably would have. Jonsson . . . that goal looked a lot like the one that beat him in the four-OT game against Pittsburgh some years back. Shot from the left boards through a maze of people and off the far pipe. He never saw it. Yashin . . . a partial screen, but honestly, Kolzig looked like he got caught in-between choices on how to play it; he should have had it. Czerkawski . . . off a pitiful giveaway, he took a pass from Asham and one-timed it under the crossbar on the stick side. That’s what butterfly goalies give up . . . sometimes, shooters hit that hole; Czerkawski did. From my seat, Kolzig played almost the best 20 minutes of his season in the first, when the Islanders were treating him like a shooting gallery with open shots from 15-25 feet. The second period, he was weaker, and the third was somewhere in between. Contrary to what a lot of Caps fans might think tonight, I don’t think he was the reason the team lost.

Special teams: D. The Caps were successful on 3 of 4 power play chances, but it’s the one they missed that killed them. They had a chance to put their skate on the Islanders’ throat when the game was 3-1, and they looked as if they couldn’t care less. At the other end, the Islanders’ power play is awful. They are 29th of 30 teams, yet they were 2 of 3. An odd way to earn a "D" . . . score three and give up two, but there it is.

Coaching: C. The team is in a position where it cannot give away standings points at home to teams like this, which means they have to play with a certain urgency. They did not, and I fault the coaches for that.

Overall: F. Again, a case of the result being less than the sum of its parts. You can’t be losing to teams like this (2nd worst road record in the East) and expect to make up ground in the standings race. You’ve got to get more offense than just your power play and Lang-Jagr. You can’t be allowing opponents time and space in your own end to pick corners on your goalie. You can’t be double-digits out of a playoff sport and play with this little urgency. The Caps had the Isles by the throat at 3-1 and just gave it away . . . just gave it away.

Three Stars:

Third Star: Brian Willsie
Second Star: Alexei Yashin
First Star: Shawn Bates

Slice o’ Pie: Jaromir Jagr, for getting his $11 million butt back in the lineup and playing pretty well, all things considered.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Ja sitten omia perään:

Niin, sattuivat sitten pelaamaan heikoimman pelinsä Hanlon-aikakaudella kun allekirjoittanut kerrankin pääsee peliä näkemään. Olisihan tuo pitänyt arvata. Muutamia hajahuomioita:

- Doig aivan paska, joka kerta omassa päässä maalipaikka kun Doigilla kiekko alimpana pelurina. Edellisissä peleissä pelannut Kiwi kärsi pakkiparinsa toheloinnista, mutta eipä itsekkään kovinkaan vakuuttanut.

- Eminger melko näkymätön, joka lienee hyvä juttu tällä kertaa. Gonza oli Gonza, ei mieleenpainuvaa kummassakaan päässä.

Berry aivan hukassa ekassa maalissa, taisi pari niittiä heittää. Zinger, sen mitä pelasi, ei vakuuttanut. Jotenkin aran näköistä peliä eikä sitä fyysisyyttäkään missään näkynyt isolta mieheltä.

- Neljäs maali täysin Olien ja sitä mukaa laitan kyllä tappion osittain kyseisen kaverin hartioille. Toivottavasti OUellet pelaa jouluyön ottelussa, sillä hyvästä alusta huolimatta Olie ei kyllä oikein vakuuttanut viime yönä.

- Lang on vireessä, siitä kertoo jo aivan uskomaton tuuri kummassakin maalissa. Jagrin kanssa paikoitellen parasta syöttöpeliä mitä olen kyseiseltä kaksikolta nähnyt Caps-paidassa. Jagr pelasi hyvin käsivammaan nähden, tosin taitaa rajoittaa laukomista aikalailla. Miller väläytteli pariin otteeseen, mutta vastaavasti myös pari aika pahaa puolustusvirhettä.

- Willsie pelasi läpi ottelun pirteästi ja mielestäni tuo nelosketju Battaglia-Gordon-Willsie oli hyvä yhdistelmä.

- Kolmosessa Whitfield painoi kuin elohiiri, mutta välistä näytti kuin jalat uppoaisivat jäähän eikä kaveri päässyt enää eteenpäin täydellä höyryllä. Grier näkyy kyllä, mutta lähinnä vain kokonsa puoleen. Kiekollinen peli on aikas hukassa. Halpernilta yleispätevää pyörintää.

- Kakkosessa Zubie pelasi minusta ok, tosin hyökkäyspäässä ei oikein tapahtunut mitään muuten kuin ylivoimalla. Samoin Bondran kohdalla. Pettinger väläytteli pariin kertaan.

Viestin lähetti Mack
Pakko sanoa että mielestäni tuo Capsien puolustus on karmea. Heillä on yksi liigan ellei liigan paras kiekollinen yv-pakki eikä sen lisäksi yhtään mitään?? Joukko jotain 5-7 pakkeja! Doig ja Kwiatkowski voivat joskus muistella tätä aikaa urastaan aikana jolloin oli todellinen läpimurron paikka mutta jotenkin tuntuu ettei poikien rahkeet riitä...

Ihmetellä täytyy myös ettei Boumedienne onnistu saamaan tuosta joukosta pelipaikkaa! Mies on nyt ollut pitkään poissa mutta tuskin helposti nousee Portlandista.

Ja Olie pelaa varmaan uransa paskinta kautta maalin suulla.
MACK

Niin, kyllä se Wittinkin puuttuminen näkyy näköjään. Pitkälti viidellä pakilla pelattiin, joista suurin osa on juuri noita 5-7 pakkeja kuten totesit. Bume saanee kyllä paikkansa, kunhan vaan tervehtyy ensin. Tilanne Caps-puolustuksessa on vaan tällä hetkellä heikko, kun farmissakin juuri Bume ja Yonkman ovat loukkaantuneina. Bume tosin oli jo viime pelissä osallistunut lämmittelyyn, joten paluu voi olla lähellä.

Olieta voi olla vaikea kaupitella noilla esityksillä, jo senkin puoleen olisi toivottavaa, että otteet paranisivat huomattavasti joulun jälkeen.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Semin

hölmöillyt itsensä pihalle U20-kisoista?

http://www.rushockey.com/events.php?i=iihf&stream=iihf_news&id=60

Keskustelupalstalla vihjailevat, että olisi pitänyt liikaa kivaa Venäjällä, eiköhän tuo iltamenoihin viittaa. Ei lupaa hyvää, tainnut nuorelta kaverilta noussa hattuun tuo kotimaahan palaaminen NHL-sankarina. Vituttaa kyllä suoraan sanoen, kun alkaa näyttää siltä, että nämä U20-kisojen Caps-pelurit vähenee vähenemistään. Hurrien riveissä Blomdahl on ollut sivussa kaikista harkkapeleistä ja nyt Semin ei välttämättä saavu ollenkaan. Jenkkien riveissä on sentään Werner ja hurreilla tuo Valdix.

Tän illan peliin muuten Hanlon on tehnyt pienen muutoksen ketjuihin, Grier kakkoseen ja Pettinger kolmoseen. Eli ketjut on jotain tällaista:

Miller-Lang-Jagr
Bondra-Zubrus-Grier
Whitfield-Halpern-Pettinger
Willsie-Gordon-Battaglia

Eminger-Gonchar
Kiwi-Doig
Berry-Zinger

maalissa toivottavasti Ouellet, mutta luulenpa että Olie jatkaa.
 
Viimeksi muokattu:

Ferris

Jäsen
Re: Seuraava kokelas

Viestin lähetti Ferris
Kuka tippuu kokoonpanosta? Doig/Kiwi? Eminger/Witt loukkaantuneet uudelleen? Kauppaa tulossa? viimeinen lienee turha toivo...

Emingerin tilalle Hajt kutsuttiin, kertoo päivän Post. Samalla tietäävät, että Ouellet pelaa ensi yönä ja Olie sitten taas Devilsejä vastaan. Milleristä suunnitellaan kolmosen sentteriä ja Halpern siirtyisi ykkösen laitaan. Tällä siirrolla valmisteltaneen Nylanderin mahdollista paluuta, tosin sekään ei vissiin ole ihan lähiaikona tapahtumassa.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Devils-tasurin arvosanat

Forwards:

Jeff Halpern: B-. I saw a microcosm of the best and the worst of Halpern’s season. He’s out there plugging on every shift and even had a couple of chances himself. He was decent on draws (won 10 of 21). But he wasn’t able to collapse quickly enough on Grant Marshall to prevent a power play goal and took a chippy little penalty that led to another power play goal.

Bates Battaglia: A. Where did Bates find the hands? That was a nice little one-time feather of a pass over a defenseman’s stick back to Mike Grier on his goal. Battaglia was forechecking his posterior off and had five shots on goal, too.

Kip Miller: B. Kip Miller . . . banger? Kippy must have found an IRS audit notice in his mail box, ‘cuz he played a bit angrier than he has in just about every game this year. He laid a couple of good hits on Devils (admittedly, those of the more diminuitive variety, but still...). He still doesn’t seem to want to shoot the puck, though.

Boyd Gordon: B-. He won 7 of 8 draws . . . it’s a skill he seems to be improving upon. He played a pretty decent game in his own end, sacrificing any thought of offense in the process. It was part of what looked like a cautious (or "simple" in the eyes of others) game played by the Caps

Brian Sutherby: C. His and Gordon’s game were very similar (both played sparingly in the third and not at all in OT). I must have missed the penalty, but I didn’t see what merited a double minor for high-sticking in the second.

Matt Pettinger: C. Six minutes; one shift in the third and none in OT. It was a very short bench in the last half of the game.

Robert Lang: C-. Lang had no official shots on goal and lost 9 of 17 draws. He got the secondary assist on the game-tying goal, but that goal was a guy being in the right spot at the right time. It wasn’t a particularly good game by Lang.

Trent Whitfield: B. One of those guys you just wind up at the opening faceoff and let him run all over the ice. He was hitting Devils, winning draws (11 of 18) and generally making himself a pest.

Mike Grier: A. He didn’t have time to think about it. He sent a pass to Battaglia, who floated it right back. Grier had time only to shift to his backhand, and as Brodeur opened the gates to cover the move across the crease, Grier just slipped a backhand through Brodeur’s legs. A 5,000 pound weight was lifted off his shoulders, and it showed the rest of the game.

Stephen Peat: incomplete. One minute, three shifts. Glen, what’s the point?

Jaromir Jagr: B+. One of his more animated, determined performances. He was demanding and commanding the puck on just about every shift (holding it for 15-20 seconds at a time, which occasionally presented a problem . . . Caps were getting out of his way instead of working for an opening), he was yapping at the refs, he was yapping at teammates, and he was actually hitting guys. If he wasn’t wearing ‘68,’ you might have thought he was a grinder.

Darcy Verot: incomplete. Two minutes, three shifts. I’d sooner see Peat out there. Was he here because of the emerging soap opera in Portland?

Defense:

Jason Doig: C-. Doig had the worst game a guy with two shots and a +1 is going to have. He was mighty mite-ful with the puck, and he looked like a distraction in front of Kolzig on the Marshall goal. He’s in a slump, but what do you do with his minutes (23 in this game)?

Rick Berry: D. He’s doing a fine job of trying to get himself benched . . . or worse. He took a cross-checking penalty late in the first and almost (actually, should have) parlayed it into a double minor when he took a swipe at another Devil (Fraser must have been touching up his coiff). He’s like the little girl with the curl . . . when he’s good, he’s very very good, but when he’s bad, he’s awful.

Brendan Witt: B+. The high sticking call is part of a pattern for Witt, drawing a bunch of stick calls recently (or so it seems). Otherwise, he played a much better game than he did the previous night in Buffalo, keeping the sneers to a minimum.

Joel Kwiatkowski: A. A mighty fine game from the Caps’ fans’ favorite punching bag. He was aggressive in moving the puck, he was good in his own end (keeping things simple), and he didn’t hesitate to pull the trigger on the rebound that found his stick. He had 26 minutes, and he played almost the entire overtime.

Sergei Gonchar: B. He had what for him is an average game . . . 30 minutes-plus, a couple of shots, and assist, a penalty, and on-ice for the other team’s power play goal. But he played a steady game, not the sleep-walking performance against Buffalo (and which is creeping into his game recently).

Chris Hajt: B-. Certainly not a bad game, got the sort of minutes someone thrust into his role with almost no experience might get (eight and change). There will be a temptation among fans to say, "hey, he’s a good guy, let’s keep him." I don’t know that I’d go that far on the basis of two games of work.

Goaltender:

Olaf Kolzig: A. He is the reason the Caps got a point, Kwiatkowski’s game-tying goal notwithstanding. The Devils are not an offensive juggernaut, but they had a bushel of good chances that Kolzig slammed the door on. His rebound control and redirecting of the puck was sharp, relieving the defensemen of having to clear rebounds or Devils from the crease. His play enabled the Caps to kill off six power plays (the Devils’ goals came on two other power plays). In his last six games, Kolzig has stopped 211 of 227 shots . . . a .930 save percentage. But even with that, he’s got a 2.64 GAA . . . that’s what facing 37.8 shots a game will do.

Special Teams: C. The penalty killing let them down late in the second as the Devils scored two goals in the last five minutes of the period. Part of the problem is giving up eight chances. If you give up that many, even against a conservative offensive team like the Devils (which has a lot of puck handling skill), it’ll burn you. The flip side is that the Caps aren’t getting many power play chances, and lately, as the power play goes, so goes the team. They converted one of two, not the result of nifty stick work, but a simple get-it-to-the-net idea . . . Gonchar fired the puck on Brodeur, and the shot handcuffed him, the rebound going right to Kwiatkowski’s stick (playing the position Peter Bondra would have manned).

Coaching: B+. Hanlon shortened his bench almost immediately (Peat and Verot played only one shift after the first ten minutes of the game), then shortened it again (the youngsters Gordon, Berry, Hajt, Pettinger, and Sutherby got almost no time in the last ten minutes and OT). You do what you have to do to get points at this stage, and that was the strategy available to Hanlon with the injuries to Zubrus and Bondra.

Overall: B-. In the overall, the Caps took nine penalties, which will get you toasted most nights. Two went to Berry, two to Sutherby, at times two of the more undisciplined players on the team. That’s 17 in two games. The Caps yielded 36 shots to a team that does not play firewagon hockey (on top of 41 the last time they played). The Caps got a point thanks to Olaf Kolzig. They deserve high marks for some grittiness in dealing with the injuries to Eminger, Bondra, and Zubrus, but they need to give their goaltender more help than he’s getting, whether it be Kolzig or Ouellet.

Three Stars:

Third Star: Sergei Brylin, Devils
Second Star: Mike Grier, Caps
First Star: Olaf Kolzig, Caps

Slice o’ Pie: Joel Kwiatkowski . . . and no sharing with those whiny Caps fans.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Kaksi erää oltiin ihan hyvin Sensien vauhdissa mukana, mutta sitten Olie the Holie imaisi taas sen yhden pakollisen länkimaalin ja se oli menoa. Onneksi Ouellet pelaa tänään Montrealia vastaan.

Farmissa muuten eräs slovakkivahti nimeltä Stana on aika hyvässä iskussa: neljä nolla peliä viimeisestä kuudesta pelistä, koko kaudella viisi - johtopaikka tällä saralla koko liigassa. GAA on 1.42 ja torjunta-% 95,2. 8-3-3 on sitten tuo voittotilasto.

Maalivahtiosasto Olien takana on siis kunnossa, nyt kun vain saataisiin kaveri sen verran pelaamaan, että voisi kaupat saada aikaiseksi. Mielestäni ois aika nostaa Ouellet/Stana-valjakko veskaritandemiksi Capseihin, etenkin kun kausi on menestyksen kannalta jo menetetty.

Sitten arvosanat:

Forwards:

Jeff Halpern: C-. Sometimes it’s better to be lucky than good, and but for scoring a goal from almost the seat of his pants, Halpern was neither tonight. Minus-4?? Now two of those were empty netters, but still . . . he was on the ice for four Ottawa goals. I don’t know that you can attribute any of them specifically to a bad play on Halpern’s part, but he was part of a team collapse in the last 25 minutes.

Bates Battaglia: B. He was out there plugging, pretty much the kind of game he’s played for the last few weeks. His persistence in front allowed Halpern to sneak in and whack the puck past Prusek for the Caps’ first goal.

Kip Miller: D. Get him off the first line, and put Sutherby in there. Miller is most assuredly not an Adam Oates, although he shoots the puck with proximate frequency. Just what he is doing out there is something for cryptographers to ascertain, ‘cuz I don’t get it.

Boyd Gordon: B-. All in all, not a bad effort considering the depth of skill Ottawa brings to the table (even without the suspended Martin Havlat). He played with a consistency at both ends until the third, when he seemed to wear down with a heavier shift load. His shot at the end of regulation was pure window dressing and allowed the Caps to avoid a more complete embarrassment in their third period play (they scored on their only other shot).

Brian Sutherby: C. I’m guessing the coaches are seeing something in Sutherby’s game they just don’t like. What that is, I’m not sure. I thought he played a decent, if unspectacular game, but he only got 11 minutes.

Matt Pettinger: D. Not a particularly good game for Matty. He seemed to struggle a bit with the shiftiness of the Ottawa forwards and looked a bit frustrated as the game wore on.

Robert Lang: B-. One of the few Caps who competed in the offensive zone, but then, that’s what you’d expect. He got a load of ice time (almost 24 minutes) and was more successful on draws than usual (won 6 of 8). His goal made it interesting, but by that time, you still had a feeling Ottawa had the game in hand.

Trent Whitfield: B. 13 minutes, wins 8 of 14 draws, forechecks. It’s the effort he brings each game lately. Nothing flashy, but it can wear on the opposition. Some credit to Ottawa for their patience in wearing the Caps and Whitfield down over the 60 minutes.

Mike Grier: C-. Another case of being neither particularly lucky nor particularly good tonight. He was invisible at both ends in the third.

Stephen Peat: incomplete. Four shifts, 2:31. If they’re going to do this to Peat, then bring up Mink or somebody, and give him some developmental time. I’ve got to think Steve is one frustrated hockey player these days.

Jaromir Jagr: C+. He logged more than 26 minutes, but it seems at this point in his career, big defensemen (Gill, Chara) give him a lot more trouble than when he was younger. He did a lot of fancy perimeter skating, but he was unable to extricate himself from the clutches (literally) fo Chara in a scoring zone.

Darcy Verot: C. That’s the best I can do with 6 minutes and 9 shifts, although he did show some ability to work himself free on a couple of occasions.

Defense:

Jason Doig: C-. Doig spends too much time getting in the way these days. He needs to be much more effective in clearing people out instead of setting screens on his own goaltender. He played a bit better tonight for two periods, but he looked somewhat out of place for much of the third.

Rick Berry: C+. I almost reached through the screen to slap Berry on one occasion when a penalty was about to be called on Ottawa, and he was skating up into the fray to stick his nose in. Cut that crap out! Again, otherwise, he had a pretty decent evening.

Brendan Witt: D. I saw things tonight with Witt I had not seen much of before in his career. Twice on one shift, he was simply and literally thrown out of the play in his own end by Ottawa forwards . . . Ottawa? I’m not much of a fan of Brendan’s these days.

Joel Kwiatkowski: C-. Welcome back to Earth, Joel. He had some good moments moving the puck, but he had other moments when he was late in coverage, too. He hasn’t had much experience on the top power play line, but with Bondra out, he’s manning that position at the right point. He needs to be a little more aggressive in looking for an opportunity to put the puck on net.

Sergei Gonchar: C-. He played an almost timid game. I don’t know if it was thinking about the firepower the Senators can bring, but Gonchar wasn’t doing much in the offensive end, and was absent after he managed to get the puck in deep in the first to lead to Halpern’s goal.

Chris Hajt: B. Played a simple game, very much within his abilities. He didn’t seem to get much time against the big guns, but that’s not to be held against him. He might have been the Caps’ best defenseman after the first period tonight.

Goaltender:

Olaf Kolzig: C-. For almost 40 minutes, he was playing as he has the past several games, turning everything aside, even when he doesn’t really have a right to. Even the first Ottawa goal, by Smolinski, was the kind that if Smolinski fires it a half second later or two inches wider, it gets deflected or rings a post. Then there was the first Alfredsson goal . . . yeesh, that was ugly. And given the lingering fragility of this team, unsuccessful as they have been in dealing with adversity, it was a big goal.

Special Teams: B. I can’t fault the Caps penalty killers as far as the skaters are concerned, since it was off a thoroughly stoppable shot that they scored their PP goal (in four chances). But again, the Caps can’t draw PP chances of their own when the game lies in the balance. Halpern’s goal on the PP was a product of singular effort on his part.

Coaching: C+. I wondered in the comfort of my recliner why Hanlon pulled Kolzig so early for an extra skater . . . not in terms of the clock, since they were two down, but for the fact that the Caps did not have clear possession of the puck or have it deep in the Senators’ zone. Given that the Senators can turn the puck around so quickly, it struck me as playing with a book of matches next to a can of gasoline . . . bang. Empty net goal. Still, the coaches are playing with a unit that is a lot easier to defend, since there is no second line to speak of.

Overall: C-. The Caps just couldn’t compete in the end with Ottawa’s depth of skill. The Senators could throw three scoring lines out there, and when you’re playing with as short a bench as Hanlon seems to be (Peat, Verot, and Pettinger were shorted time; Sutherby had 11 minutes), a team like Ottawa can – and did – wear the Caps down. It was clearly evident in the third, when the Senators could have built a condo in the Caps end with all the time they were spending there . . . if there was a time of possession statistic, it would have weighed heavily in Ottawa’s favor. I give the Caps higher marks for giving the effort, for the most part, but the top line is too easy to defend with nothing underneath, and the effects ripple through the roster and their on-ice performance.

Three Stars:

Third Star: Wade Redden
Second Star: Jason Spezza
First Star: Daniel Alfredsson

Slice o’ Pie: Jeff Halpern, if only because he needs one.
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Alkukauden pelaaja-arvosanat

Forwards:

Jaromir Jagr:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 77 games, 38-49-87, +9, 44 PIMS, 9 GWG, PP = 14-22-36

A whole lot of not much going on lately. If you look at a stat sheet, you see a lot of time on ice and a lot of shots, his production has fallen off. In 14 games in November, he was 6-14-20, +8. In the 14 games since, he’s 4-8-12, -9. He hasn’t had a "plus" game since November 29th, part of a team-wide problem at even strength. He hasn’t had a multi-goal game this season. Hard as it sounds, he’s not paid to try hard, he’s paid to produce -- great players find a way. He’s not doing so.

Updated prediction . . . he’ll be traded to New York.

Robert Lang:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 80 games, 24-49-73, +11, 24 PIMS, 2 GWG, PP = 12-21-33

It would be a lot to expect for Lang to keep up the 11-11-22, +8 pace he had in November. He hasn’t been that far off, though, in his 17 games since (6-9-15), although he’s been -7 since. The difference? . . . Yup, even strength. In November, he was 2-7-9 on the PP, since then he’s been 3-6-9. That and the fact that it seemed everything he threw at the net went it or almost did (11 goals on 33 shots in November). He’s been more mortal since (6/32, still not bad). He’s the Caps MVP to date, but on this team . . . big deal.

Updated prediction . . . he’ll be traded to Dallas.

Dainius Zubrus:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 67 games, 22-28-50, +13, 46 PIMS, 1 GWG, PP = 1-2-3

Just when it looks as if he’s going to break through and take the next step to being a legitimate offensive threat and a power forward to be reckoned with, he gets hurt. He’s one of those on this team, though, who is having a devil of a time at even strength. Overall, he’s 11-12-23. But the power play accounts for 6-6-12 of that. Wonder why he’s -11 on the year? All that aside, he’ll probably end up being the veteran forward who survives the great purge to come.

Updated Prediction: 60 games, 17-20-37, -16.

Peter Bondra:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 77 games, 33-28-61, +3, 46 PIMS, 7 GWG, PP = 17-11- 28

Bondra hasn’t finished a year with as bad a number as -10 since his rookie year . . . he’s -14 right now, and it isn’t likely to improve. His production at even strength has all but disappeared (7-3-10 in 38 games). The spirit is there, but one just has the feeling watching him that the end of his stay here is at hand.

Updated Prediction: He’ll be traded to Detroit.

Michael Nylander:

Pre-Season Projection: 56 games, 9-27-36, even, 20 PIMS, 1 GWG, PP = 3-7-10

Hardly seems worth it to rush him back now . . . unless you’re showcasing him for a trade, which is a real possibility (though what the Caps would get for him is negligible).

Updated Prediction: He’ll be traded to Vancouver.

Kip Miller:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 70 games, 10-32-42, +1, 18 PIMS, 2 GWG, PP = 3-13-16

Last year, he was a $950,000 bargain. This year, he’s a guy who will probably be gone after this year (if not sooner) and quickly fade into the recesses of Caps’ fans memories as one of three Millers to play for the team. He hasn’t played badly, if you look only at his accumulated statistics (at -3, he’s among the leaders in +/- on this team, for example). But he’s spent a lot of time at left wing on the top line, to little effect. He has two even strength points in his last 17 games. He has one even strength goal this season.

Updated Prediction: He’ll squeeze himself into Jagr’s suitcase when Jagr is traded to New York

Steve Konowalchuk:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 75 games, 16-20-36, +3, 68 PIMS, 4 GWG, PP = 1-1-2

One of the few players on track to hit his projection . . . but he’s doing it for Colorado.

Updated Prediction: He’ll be showing Olaf Kolzig the sights around Denver in March.

Jeff Halpern:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 79 games, 16-25-41, +6, 70 PIMS, 2 GWG, PP = 2-1-3

Mommy, make it sto-o-o-o-op! He is on a pace for a -46. There were 10 guys on the 1974-1975 inaugural team with worse numbers, but that was when there was more offense. It would be the worst such number on the Caps since Rick Green was -45 in 1978-1979. Green was later traded in a package for Rod Langway. We should be so lucky a second time. Don’t hold your breath.

Updated Prediction: He’ll be moved quietly in a flurry of other activity to Anaheim.

Mike Grier:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 80 games, 18-22-40, +3, 38 PIMS, 2 GWG, PP = 2-3-5

What was I thinking? 18 goals? Since scoring 10 goals in his first 38 games as a Cap, he has a total of seven in his last 83, three in his last 63. Part of the problem with the Caps this year is that the third line has offered almost no threat offensively, so when they have to deal with the opponent’s top line, they can end up getting a full-bore effort thrown at them. Seeing as how the third line (if you consider it to be Grier-Halpern-Battaglia) is a combined -40 (Grier being a -16), it’s been one long Stephen King story.

Updated Prediction: I have a feeling he’ll stay, if for no other reason than you can’t trade everyone, and this is a guy McPhee has had interest in for some time. Perhaps as the Caps’ season is forgotten by the larger NHL this year, the pressure we’ll be off, and he can rediscover his game . . . 76 games, 8-14-22, -21.

Brian Sutherby:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 72 games, 8-17-25, +2, 88 PIMS, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

Is he a center or a winger . . . a fourth liner or a third liner . . . or a second liner . . . is he a captain-in-waiting or an 8-minute-a-night guy? Hard to tell from the way he’s been used this year (not to mention shuttled to Portland and back). Here is one guy who might benefit from being sent to Portland for the duration of this year, if only to keep him out of the septic tank that has become the Caps season where he might pick up bad habits.

Updated Prediction: He’ll end up staying because a lot of guys will be leaving . . . 62 games, 4-4-8, -8

Trent Whitfield:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 14 games, 0-1-1, even, 14 PIMS, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

Looks like he’ll get more games, and he’s earned them. Of how many guys can you say that on this team? He has a role, he knows his role, and he plays that role pretty well. Give the team 10-12 minutes a night, tempo game, hit some people, be good on draws. Points are gravy.

Updated Prediction: 40 games, 1-3-4, -8.

Stephen Peat:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 23 games, 0-2-2, -2, 51 PIMS, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

Did you know that Scott Gomez was picked only five slots ahead of Peat in 1998? When was the last time Peat had as many as 10 minutes ice time for the Caps in a game? . . . never. He’s averaging 5:30 for the Caps this year (that’s actually more than last year), and he might as well be selling cotton candy in Section 418 for the time he’s getting under Glen Hanlon. The lack of investment in his development as a hockey player has left Peat a one-trick pony . . . and that’s a trick for which Hanlon has expressed little affection.

Updated Prediction: Peat will see fewer total minutes for the remainder of the season than Sergei Gonchar averages per game.

Boyd Gordon:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 18 games, 2-2-4, even, 18 PIMs, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

Gordon has all the makings of becoming a solid, if unspectacular professional. He can play any forward position, he’s responsible, and he’s shown some talent in taking draws. You wish he was a couple inches taller and 15 pounds heavier. One suspects he might get sent down to Portland in the wake of this Titanic of a season being put together by the Caps, but injuries and a lack of guys who can skate in the forward direction might put a halt to that idea.

Updated Prediction: 65 games, 3-9-12, -12.

Alexander Semin:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 60 games, 11-13-24, -4, 28 PIMS, 1 GWG, PP = 2-1-3

The worry with this guy is that as the Caps season deteriorates further, he’s going to pick up some bad work habits, and he’s showing some tendencies of youth (if some news reports can be believed) to resist authority and to cut corners. He has a wealth of offensive skill, but he hasn’t much consistency in his own end. The Caps don’t need that sort of combination, now or in the future.

Updated Prediction: 38 games, 7-12-19, -4.

Matt Pettinger:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 28 games, 2-4-6, even, 22 PIMs, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

He’s progressed quite a bit from last year. He can be one of the "Plumbers" kind of players fans might remember in the 1980's . . . a nastier Gaetan Duschene type. After sustaining an injury on Halloween, he’s struggled to regain the offensive part of his game (1-1-2, -9 in his last 20 games).

Updated Prediction: 58 games, 5-3-8, -13

Brian Willsie:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 56 games, 10-13-23, +3, 30 PIMS, 1 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

A player who seemed ready to flourish under Glen Hanlon (2-1-3, +2 in seven games under Hanlon), one who has some offensive upside and can be an effective checker, and what happens? . . . injured. Just another story of the Caps’ season.

Updated Prediction: When he returns to the lineup, Caps fans will ask, "when did we get him?"

Bates Battaglia:

Our Pre-Season Projection: none

He started abominably, then picked up his game under Hanlon. He’s not nearly the threat he was when he played with Carolina, but he’s settled into a role as a good 3rd-4th line energy kind of guy who can create a little bit of offense. He might even be around next year, which I didn’t think possible a month ago.

Updated Prediction: 62 games, 5-9-14, -16

***************

Defensemen:

Brendan Witt:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 74 games, 2-8-10, +16, 104 PIMs, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0 . . . and much opponents’ equipment strewn across the ice

Well, that was a bit off base, wasn’t it? Witt has become a 3-4 defenseman, nothing more. He is not bereft of hockey sense, and he’s not without talent, but he’s never really approached the potential thought of him when he was drafted. He isn’t particularly physical, at last not nearly so as his reputation suggests, and this should be the centerpiece of his game.

Updated Prediction: Somehow, in the wreckage of this season, he’ll survive.

Steve Eminger:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 76 games, 6-18-24, +8, 38 PIMs, 1 GWG, PP = 1-2-3

He looks better than his short term last year, but he has a pretty fair way to go, too. He looks a lot like the end of Johansson’s career, which isn’t necessarily bad, since he’s going in the other direction. He hasn’t played bad defense, despite his gruesome -10 plus-minus. He hasn’t shown much in the offensive end, but one would hope he’d err on the side of playing defense at this stage.

Updated Projection: 72 games, 1-6-7, -16

Sergei Gonchar:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 80 games, 20-51-71, +18, 54 PIMs, 4 GWG, PP = 10-24-34

Gonchar has regressed considerably from the improvements he made as a defender last year. He is entirely a power play creature this year (25 of his 39 points), and he’s -22 on the top pairing. He seems less inclined than ever to take or deliver a hit. He could be the cornerstone of the defense until Eminger assumes the role 5-6 years from now, or he can play himself into trade bait, since the Caps would seem unlikely to pay the raise implicit in his next contract.

Updated Prediction: He’s a decent bet to be gone in March.

Joel Kwiatkowski:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 72 games, 1-4-5, even, 26 PIMs, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

Kwiatkowski is not nearly as bad as Caps fans give him credit for, but neither can it be said that he figures prominently in the team’s plans after this year. He is a decent skater, he shows some indications of having a shot, and he can play well when he keeps it simple. But, he is this generation’s Pat Ribble. A footnote in the history of the franchise 5-6 years down the road.

Updated Prediction: 82 games, 7-7-14, -26

Jason Doig:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 78 games, 2-5-7, even, 138 PIMs, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

He gives indications from time to time of having considerable raw talent. He skates well for a big man, he can hit, and he can at least get the puck to the net. But, he is prone to playing himself out of position, of going for a hit when the situation merely calls for steering the man off the puck, and is not a particularly good puck handler or passer. He doesn’t seem to figure in the team’s long term plans either

Updated Projection: 82 games, 3-11-14, -15

Rick Berry:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 24 games, 0-2-2, -3, 56 PIMs, 0 GWG, PP = 0-0-0

Berry sometimes looks as if he can be a successor to Ken Klee, other times he looks like he can be a poster boy for the WWE. He can look good on one shift, then do something incredibly stupid on the next. This is a problem Klee battled from time to time in his tenure with the Caps, taking the inopportune penalty. But Berry’s are particularly annoying, since many take place during stoppages in play.

Updated Prediction: 60 games, 1-5-6, -8

*****************

Goaltenders:

Olaf Kolzig:

Our Pre-Season Projection (OT losses counted as losses): 71 games, 33-28-9, 4100 minutes, 2.51 GAA, .917 SV, 4 SO

In the best of times over the last half dozen years, Kolzig has been the Caps. It’s true now, too . . . unfortunately. He probably hasn’t stolen a win for the team this year. He’s played very well in stretches, but with the team defense in front of him being its worst since the pre-Langway days, every little shortcoming has been magnified. He can be beaten high-glove, and he had a disconcerting tendency to give up five-hole goals over a 12-15 game stretch. He, like the rest of the team, had played just well enough to lose on most nights. He makes almost all of the saves he should make, but he rarely makes that 10-bell save that lifts a team. And, he’s allowed some soft goals to creep into his game, especially early, as was the case in 2001-2002. He looks like a guy who needs a change of scenery; he just doesn’t look as if he trusts the guys in front of him.

Updated Prediction: He’ll look good in maroon.

Sebastien Charpentier:

Our Pre-Season Projection: 14 games, 4-7-1, 2.68 GAA, .910 SV, 0 SO

He’s the forgotten goalie. He didn’t play badly in his opportunities, but a small goalie facing a lot of shots is a recipe for trouble. Then, a chronic condition overtook him. He should be commended for battling to get on the ice at all, but it would seem that he’s played his last game as a Cap.

Maxime Ouellet:

Our Preseason Prediction: none, we thought he’d spend all year in Portland

When he gets some game under his belt, he’ll be a worthy successor to Kolzig. He sometimes struggles with the pace of the game and the traffic it creates, but he looks to be a fundamentally sound butterfly goaltender who doesn’t resort to the flopping around and overplaying the puck that can sometimes result with young guys. When he plays calmly, he is hard to beat.

Updated Prediction: He will be the number one goalie by the end of the year, and the job will be his to lose hereafter (but he will have the next guy breathing down his neck)

Rastislav Stana:

Our Preseason Prediction: none, we thought he’d get about 25 games in Portland

He seems to have really come on. He is not the technician that Ouellet is, but he is quicker and a bit more aggressive. You wouldn’t necessarily use him for a training video, but he stops the puck, and simple and obvious as it seems, it is the goalie’s first and most important job.

Prediction: He will finish the season in Washington, with Ouellet. Sorry, Pirates fans.

Special Teams:

Our Pre-Season Projection: Power Play: 20.8 percent (3rd) – Penalty Killing: 81.7 percent (25th). It will be the power play improvement that will be what makes a difference for the Caps.

The Caps had all the makings of a top notch power play. They would be able to field two units, one a high-end skill set with the likes of Jagr, Lang, and Gonchar. They could field a competent second unit with an emerging Dainius Zubrus, Mike Grier, and Bondra to be the designated shooter. The idea was to use two squads. Well, that didn’t last long. Eventually, the team resorted to the star-line of Jagr, Lang, Bondra, Gonchar, and Zubrus to stand sentry in front. It has been as high as third in the league rankings, but this group is getting fewer and fewer opportunities to show its stuff as the Caps draw fewer and fewer penalties. It’s still a powerful weapon . . . it just isn’t getting enough chances.

The penalty killers are about where they left off last year, in the bottom third of the league. They are not particularly aggressive or adept at denying passes, and they are dreadful at clearing the puck out of the zone. Grier and to a lesser extent Zubrus are decent shot blockers, but the usual "checkers" Halpern and Grier have struggled, as they have at even strength. Unfortunately for the Caps, the problems on the penalty kill have largely negated the success they’ve had on the power play, making the net of the two extraordinarily average.

Updated Prediction . . . don’t expect either unit to change much from where it is now, but for the worse when Jagr, Lang, and Bondra are moved, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the power play dramatically.

Overall:

Pre-Season Summary Prediction: "It says here that the Caps will be a much better team offensively, more closely approximating the considerable potential their lineup suggests. They’ll need it. They will also give up more goals than last year, which will make people forget or ignore the fact that they have an elite goaltender behind them. Jagr will improve, but is probably never going to duplicate his statistics in Pittsburgh as a member of this team. Peter Bondra will improve on last year’s disappointing power play goal totals. The Southeast Division race will go down to the last weekend, but this time, Tampa will come up short. The Peerless prognosticates that the Caps will finish 82-0-0-0 . . . the NHL will interpret this as finishing 37-29-10-6, with 90 points to win the SE by one thin point over Tampa Bay."

Ja vastaanlaisia pelaaja-arvosteluja alkukaudesta ansiokkaassa Caps-cornerin artikkelissa
 

Ferris

Jäsen
Puolustus vahvistui?

Rohloff palasi.

Cassidyllä oli omat suosikkinsa, Rohloff taas on näitä Hanlonin alaisuudessa Portlandissa pelanneita pakkeja. Todellinen peruspuolustaja, jonka suurin heikkous NHL-tasolla lienee se, riittääkö nopeus. Kyseinen kaveri pelasi Wilsonin viimeisellä kaudella 16 peliä kun puolustuksesta uupui puolet veteraaneista loukkaantumisten takia. Muistini mukaan hän oli ihan ok-kaveri kolmospakkipariin.
 
Kirjaudu sisään, jos haluat vastata ketjuun. Jos sinulla ei ole vielä käyttäjätunnusta, rekisteröidy nyt! Kirjaudu / Rekisteröidy
Ylös